June 12, 2010

Israel’s Struggling Only Tightens Bind

They may sincerely believe they’re being strategic, but their reaction against the Freedom flotilla suggests Israel and America are primarily focused on evading the international community. Such an objective could hardly be termed strategic.

Maybe they’ll get through this rough patch like the last few and everything will slowly return to normal. It’s a bad bet that people will forget this time though. Turkey won’t.

If there’s any confusion over Turkey’s interaction with Iran, one can look directly at Gaza, the Freedom flotilla, and ultimately US-Israeli protectionism. We’ll never know how receptive Turkey could be towards US sanctions on Iran while Washington fails to restrain Israel’s actions, then follows on demand. With Turkey evolving into the Muslim world’s political spear-tip against Israel, it now finds itself directly opposed to America, last defender of Israel.

While US officials such as Defense Secretary Robert Gates express disappointment with Turkey’s negotiations with Iran, the feeling is mutual as America shields Israel from an international investigation. Gates remarked in Brussels, “I was disappointed by the Turkey vote on the Iranian sanctions.”

Meanwhile State Department Spokesman Philip Crowley feigned ignorance in response to a Weekly Standard report speculating an investigation.

"We are not aware of any resolution that will be introduced at the UN next week," he said. "We are in discussions with the UN, and I think UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon is evaluating the situation."

"We support an Israeli led investigation and we are open to the potential ways in which the international community can participate in it. The investigation has to be impartial so it can been seen as credible. International participation in some fashion can enhance the result, the outcome and the support for the investigation."

It can sound sensible at first to allow an Israeli-led investigation with international monitors, which Israel has reportedly agreed to. Trading Palestinian and Arab support in proxy negotiations at the expense of Israel’s participation would be nonproductive. On the other hand Israel’s participation sounds disinterested, as it considers proxy negotiations a waste of time.

And what good is Israeli support without the Palestinians’ and the larger Muslim world? Or the wider world for that matter?

The odds favor Israel and America heading towards a new confrontation at the UN, so long as they refuse international pressure for an international investigation. Israel is unlikely to allow one because it would probably be ruled against, but the Gaza coast is headed directly towards Israel’s swing allies against Iran. The international community - China and Russia especially - could push back after giving in to sanctions.

They haven’t changed positions on Iran just to see America’s relationship with Israel go unchanged.

Rather than bury the crisis, Israel and America are fanning their own flames surrounding them. They must find a way to nullify the Freedom flotilla without further destabilizing the region. In the end that seems to be an international investigation composed of Israeli, Turkish, Palestinian, Egyptian, US and EU officials. The investigation would be further tied to an initiative on how to end Gaza’s blockade.

If America helps Israel face the situation head on it may be able to escape with relatively modest damage. Resist and the international community will keep resisting back at the command of the Palestinians.

That isn’t the side Israel wants to be on with a two-state solution or Iran’s nuclear program.

6 comments:

  1. RE 'China and Russia especially - could push back after giving in to sanctions.

    They haven’t changed positions on Iran just to see America’s relationship with Israel go unchanged.' Their approval of the sanctions are temporary, and will come with many loopholes. Russia and China have the most to gain from this beside Turkey. Russo/Sino wants the West to stay aligned with Israel. It only makes their positions stronger in C/Asia. They are not sitting back, they are influencing and making more deals now. While the West stays bogged down. Just my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Turkey has nothing to gain from the EU, or U.S./NATO. It would not surprise me if they become blatantly more blatantly aligned with a Sino/Russo pact. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization [SCO] is having their summit now. I am sure Turkey is on the front burner. Iran, and Pakistan are observer Nations, so is India.
    Israel used their threat against China to approve the sanctions. Go along, or we attack Iran, and there goes a major portion of your energy supply. Israel made a grave mistake. China will be heard from again over this threat.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Agree that Russia and China's positions may be temporary, and could possibly be setting up US and Israel on Iran. Still, we would expect them to leverage their position while they against the Freedom flotilla and Gaza, which China objects to as US hypocrisy. I also agree that China won't take orders from Israel in the end. Lots of underground dealing.

    Turkey does have something to gain from the US and EU, it just has more to gain from an Asian alliance. It shouldn't burn the bridge completely, but operate as the front-man for any pact with China/Russia/Pakistan/Iran.

    ReplyDelete
  4. http://realityzone-realityzone.blogspot.com/2010/06/wilkerson-cheney-and-far-right-take.html

    Listen closely when Wilkerson relates what Powell told W ABOUT HIS "PENTAGON".
    he comes right out and say it. lol

    ReplyDelete
  5. MUST READ

    http://www.rightweb.irc-online.org/articles/display/china_and_america_jostle_in_middle_east

    ReplyDelete
  6. Makes sense that the Middle East/West Asia would be the center of a hemispheric struggle between America and China. But while important, this may be the main distraction. China will win through Africa and South America.

    ReplyDelete